ANN KOTZIAN, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN B. MURPHY, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-03-28
No. 1D12-0125
ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
82 So. 3d 1226 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. Within 30 days, the circuit court shall enter a final judgment in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will comply with this directive, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gotowala v. State, 162 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …mmary denial of the petition frustrates meaningful appellate review. On remand, the trial court must either conduct an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s petition or provide a written reason as to why it is denying the petition. See Shanks v. State, 82 So. 3d 1226, 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. . For example, a trial judge cannot deny a petition based solely on his or her distaste for the particular charged crime. See Godoy v.…
  • Nelsa McGann Grey v. State, 199 So. 3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). While the decision to seal a record is in the trial judge’s “sole discretion,” the exercise , of discretion requires “good reason based on [the] facts and circumstances of [the petitioner’s] individual case.” Shanks v. State, 82 So. 3d 1226, 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Here, there is no dispute [*990] that Appellant met the prerequisites for obtaining an order sealing her record. Thus, the question is whether the court had “good reason based on the facts and circumstances” of Appellant’s…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw