CARDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND LENWOOD HOLLISTER, JR., APPELLANTS,
v.
C.O.D. TREES PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal granted C.O.D. Trees Partnership's motion for sanctions against Carden & Associates, Inc. and Lenwood Hollister, Jr. for failing to personally appear at a court-ordered appellate mediation conference in violation of Florida Appellate Rule 9.720.
The court held that absent being excused by the court order, a party must personally appear at appellate mediation and an insurance company representative cannot substitute for the party's appearance. Accordingly, sanctions were imposed against Carden and Hollister.
[1] A court may impose sanctions against a party who fails to appear at an appellate mediation conference without good cause.
[2] A party is deemed to appear at a mediation conference if the party or its representative, the party's counsel of record, and a representative of the insurance carrier for…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under rule 9.720(b), which governs appellate mediations, the court may impose sanctions against a party who fails to appear at a mediation conference without good cause.”
Establishes the legal basis for imposing sanctions under the appellate rule.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe court ordered appellate mediation in this matter. At the scheduled mediation conference, neither Hollister nor a representative of Carden appeared…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Sanctions cases and more on FLexlaw
ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
C.O.D. Trees Partnership filed a motion with this court seeking sanctions against Carden & Associates, Inc. (Carden), and Lenwood Hollister, Jr., for their failure to appear at appellate mediation in violation of this court’s order. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.720. We grant the motion.
This court ordered appellate mediation in this matter. Under rule 9.720(b), which governs appellate mediations, the court may impose sanctions against a party who fails to appear at a mediation conference without good cause. The rule further provides that, unless changed by order of the court, a party is deemed to appear at a mediation conference if certain persons are physically present, including “the party or its representative,” the party’s “counsel of record,” and “a representative of the insurance carrier for an insured party.” Fla. RApp. P. 9.720(a).
In this case, neither Hollister nor a representative of Carden attended the mediation; only their insurance company representative and attorney appeared. No motion was filed with the court seeking to excuse the personal appearance of Carden and/or Hollister from the mediation. The law is clear that, absent being excused by the court, the party must appear at mediation and a representative of the insurance company cannot take the party’s place. See Carbino v. Ward, 801 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). The fact that Carbino involved a trial mediation, rather than an appellate mediation, is of no relevance since the appearance language in the applicable rules are identical. *863 See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.720(b). See also Harrelson v. Hensley, 891 So.2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
Accordingly, we grant the motion for sanctions. Carden and Hollister are hereby ordered to pay the following amounts as sanctions within 80 days from the date of this opinion:
(1) all fees charged by the mediator in connection with this appellate mediation; and,
(2) C.O.D.’s reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in preparing for and attending the appellate mediation and filing the instant motion for sanctions.
In the event the parties cannot agree on the amount of the reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, we appoint the trial judge as a commissioner to conduct an evidentia-ry hearing and to make a recommendation to this court regarding such amount. Any dispute over the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees and costs in paragraph (2) above will not delay the obligation to timely pay the mediator fees set forth in paragraph (1).
MOTION GRANTED.
EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
HDE, Inc. v. Bee-Line Supply Co., Inc., 181 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…of this court’s order of mediation and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Also, the absence of a representative of HDE violated the order referring the matter to mediation. As we held in Carden & Associates, Inc. v. C.O.D. Trees Partnership, 83 So. 3d 862 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) and Carbino v. Ward, 801 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), sanctions are appropriate for a party’s failure to appear at a court-ordered mediation even though a representative of his insurance company was present. See also Mash v.…
-
Alvarez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)…); Carbino v. Ward, 801 So. 2d 1028, 1031 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (determining paying “mediator costs and attorney's fees” was sufficient sanction for failure to appear at mediations without good cause); Carden & Assocs., Inc. v. C.O.D. Trees P'ship, 83 So. 3d 862, 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (ordering appellant to pay “all fees charged by the mediator in connection with [the] appellate mediation; and, . . . [appellee’s] reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred in preparing for and attending the appellate…
Authorities Cited
- Carbino v. Gaylon Earl Ward, 801 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Harrelson v. Hensley, 891 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)