HILDA MEDINA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2012-03-30
No. 5D12-533
PALMER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
84 So. 3d 424 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence for violation of probation in case no. 08-CF-3445, in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hogle v. State, 250 So. 3d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
    …Additionally, the court imposed a $342.86 fine pursuant to section 775.083, as well as a related $17.14 surcharge pursuant to section 938.04. Because the court imposed these as part of the $775 lump sum, the court erred. See Nix v. 5 State, 84 So. 3d 424, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“The fine authorized by section 775.083(1) is discretionary and, thus, it was error for the trial court to impose the $1,050 fine under this statute without specifically pronouncing the fine at the sentencing hearing. .…
  • Anderson v. State, 247 So. 3d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  • LaGregory Tasavion Jaquan Grigges v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw