PAUL COUCHMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal held that the University of Central Florida (UCF), when acting as a student disciplinary entity pursuant to rules and regulations adopted by its Board of Trustees, is not an "agency" subject to Florida's Administrative Procedure Act because its authority derives from the Florida Constitution rather than the Legislature. Consequently, a student challenging disciplinary sanctions must seek certiorari review in circuit court rather than appeal to this court.
No. When UCF acts as a student disciplinary entity pursuant to its duly adopted rules and regulations, it does not come within the definition of an "agency" subject to the APA because its authority to adopt and enforce a student code of conduct derives from the Florida Constitution, not from the Legislature. Therefore, the proper remedy for challenging such disciplinary action is a petition for certiorari review in circuit court.
[1] A state university acting as a student disciplinary entity pursuant to its duly adopted rules and regulations is not an "agency" subject to Florida's Administrative Proce…
[2] The Administrative Procedure Act applies to a state university only when it is acting pursuant to statutory authority derived from the Legislature.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“when UCF is acting as a student disciplinary entity pursuant to its duly adopted rules and regulations, it does not come within the definition of an "agency" subject to the APA, and therefore this action must be transferred to circuit court”
The core holding that student disciplinary actions by state universities are not subject to APA review when based on constitutional authority.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePaul Couchman, a UCF student, was subjected to disciplinary sanctions by UCF for alleged violations of the student code of conduct. The student code o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Administrative Procedure Act cases and more on FLexlaw
ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION EN BANC
The University of Central Florida (UCF) has filed a Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Jurisdiction an appeal filed by UCF student Paul Couchman. Couchman is seeking review of UCF’s decision to impose certain disciplinary sanctions against him. The underlying issue is whether UCF is an administrative body subject to Florida’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when, in purported compliance with rules and regulations adopted by UCF’s Board of Trustees, it takes disciplinary action against a student for alleged improper conduct. If so, Couchman is entitled to seek judicial review in this court pursuant to sections 120.68(1) and (2)(a), Florida Statutes (2011) (“A party who is adversely affected by final agency action is entitled to judicial review.... Judicial review shall be sought in the appellate district where the agency maintains its headquarters or where a party resides or as otherwise provided by law”). If not, then Couchman’s proper remedy is to seek certiorari review in the circuit court. See Fla. Water Servs. Corp. v. Robinson, 856 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (party seeking to challenge decision of administrative body, acting in its quasi-judicial capacity, is entitled to present its due pro*447cess claim, but only by presenting petition for certiorari review to the circuit court where administrative body is not subject to APA). We conclude that when UCF is acting as a student disciplinary entity pursuant to its duly adopted rules and regulations, it does not come within the definition of an “agency” subject to the APA, and therefore this action must be transferred to circuit court.
The APA applies only to those administrative bodies that come within the Act’s definition of an “agency.” In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor, 334 So.2d 561, 562 n. 2 (Fla.1976). Section 120.52(1) defines “agency” to mean
the following officers or governmental entities if acting pursuant to powers other than those derived from the constitution:
(a)... the Board of Governors of the State University System; ... educational units; ....
(Emphasis added). “Educational unit” includes a state university “when the university is acting pursuant to statutory authority derived from the Legislature.” § 120.52(6), Fla. Stat. (2011).
Thus, by its express terms, the APA only applies to a state university when the university is acting pursuant to statutory authority from the Legislature. See also § 1001.706(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2011). When a state university is acting pursuant to authority derived from Florida’s Constitution, the APA does not apply. NAACP, Inc. v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 876 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (where State University System’s Board of Governors adopts rules pursuant to powers derived from the Constitution, said rules are not subject to challenge under APA).
Prior to November 2002, Florida’s state universities’ governing boards derived their authority from the Legislature. NAACP, 876 So.2d at 638. However, in November 2002, Florida voters approved an amendment to article IX of the Florida Constitution, providing:
SECTION 7. State University System.—
(a) PURPOSES. In order to achieve excellence through teaching students, advancing research and providing public service for the benefit of Florida’s citizens, their communities and economies, the people hereby establish a system of governance for the state university system of Florida.
(b) STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM. There shall be a single state university system comprised of all public universities. A board of trustees shall administer each public university and a board of governors shall govern the state university system.
(c) LOCAL BOARDS OF TRUSTEES. Each local constituent university shall be administered by a board of trustees consisting of thirteen members dedicated to the purposes of the state university system. The board of governors shall establish the powers and duties of the boards of trustees. Each board of trustees shall consist of six citizen members appointed by the governor and five citizen members appointed by the board of governors. The appointed members shall be confirmed by the senate and serve staggered terms of five years as provided by law. The chair of the faculty senate, or the equivalent, and the president of the student body of the university shall also be members.
(d) STATEWIDE BOARD OF GOVERNORS. The board of governors shall be a body corporate consisting of seventeen members. The board shall operate, regulate, control, and be fully responsible for the management of the *448 whole university system. These responsibilities shall include, but not be limited to, defining the distinctive mission of each fituent university and its articulation with free public schools and community colleges, ensuring the well-planned coordination and operation of the system, and avoiding wasteful duplication of facilities or programs. The board’s management shall be subject to the powers of the legislature to appropriate for the expenditure of funds, and the board shall account for such expenditures as provided by law. The governor shall appoint to the board fourteen citizens dedicated to the purposes of the state university system. The appointed members shall be confirmed by the senate and serve staggered terms of seven years as provided by law. The commissioner of education, the chair of the advisory council of faculty senates, or the equivalent, and the president of the Florida student association, or the equivalent, shall also be members of the board.
(Emphasis added).
The Board of Governors created by this amendment came into existence on January 7, 2003.
In accordance with the aforesaid amendment to article IX of the Florida Constitution, the Florida Legislature has attempted to define and distinguish the respective constitutional duties and responsibilities accorded to the Board of Governors and the Legislature. While the Legislature continues to maintain the responsibility to, inter alia, appropriate state funds for the establishment, maintenance and operation of institutions of higher learning,1 it also *449recognized that the Board of Governors had the constitutional duty to operate, regulate, control, and be fully responsible for the management of the State University System.2 § 1001.705(2), (3), Fla. Stat. (2011).
As further recognized by the Legislature, the constitutional powers of the Board of Governors (and its designee boards of trustees) include the authority to adopt and enforce a code of conduct for its students. For example, section 1001.706(3)(h) provides:
The Board of Governors, or the board’s designee, may establish a uniform code of conduct and appropriate penalties for violations of its regulations by students and student organizations, including regulations governing student academic honesty. Such penalties, unless otherwise provided by law, may include reasonable fines, the withholding of diplomas or transcripts pending compliance with regulations or payment of fines, and the imposition of probation, suspension, or dismissal.
Pursuant to Florida Board of Governors Regulation 1.001, the Board of Governors delegated broad constitutional authority to the university boards of trustees to administer their respective universities. These broad powers included the power to adopt rules and regulations establishing a uniform student code of conduct and related penalties. Fla. Bd. of Govs. Reg. 1.001(4)(a)(10) (as amended Sept. 16, 2010). Here, Couchman was alleged to have violated UCF’s student code of conduct as established by its Board of Trustees. Because UCF’s power to adopt and enforce a student code of conduct derived from the Florida Constitution and not from the Legislature, its actions are not subject to chal*450lenge under the APA. We recede from Morris v. Florida Agricultural & Mechanical University, 23 So.3d 167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009), to the extent that decision is inconsistent with this opinion.3
UCF’s motion is granted to the extent that we hereby transfer this cause to the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court, in and for Orange County, Florida.
MOTION GRANTED; CASE TRANSFERRED.
ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN, SAWAYA, PALMER, MONACO, TORPY, LAWSON, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rivera v. Univ. of S. Fla. ST. Petersburg, 176 So. 3d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…er v. Univ. of W. Fla., 85 So. 3d 571, 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (concluding that review of a disciplinary determination made by a state university is properly sought by certiorari petition in the circuit court); Couchman v. [*364] Univ. of Cent Fla., 84 So. 3d 445, 449-50 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (same). We therefore transfer this case to the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, for treatment as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(b)(1). The circuit court may accep…
-
Staskus v. UCF (9th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2016)…NDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner Joshua Staskus seeks certiorari review of his suspension through the Fall 2015 term from the University of Central Florida. This Court has jurisdiction under Couchman v. University of Central Florida, 84 So. 3d 445, 449-50 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(c)(3). Petitioner failed to preserve many of his arguments for appellate review. Additionally, he was not deprived of due process when the hearing panel considered a documen…
-
Noble v. Fla. Int'l Univ. (11th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
Authorities Cited
- In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor. in re Administrative Procedure Act, 334 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1976)
- NAACP, Inc. v. Fla. Bd. OF Regents & State Bd. of Educ., 876 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Fla. Water Servs. Corp. v. Hannah M. "Nancy" Robinson, 856 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Morris v. Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ., 23 So. 3d 167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)