MARK SHAWVER, APPELLANT,
v.
ANTHONY SCARVELLI, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Injunction For Protection Against Repeat Violence cases and more on FLexlaw
Mark Shawver timely appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence entered against him in favor of Anthony Scarvelli. He argues that the trial court erred by entering the injunction where the petition only alleged one act of violence and the evidence presented by petitioner was only sufficient to support a finding of one act of violence. We agree. See § 784.046(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“ ‘Repeat violence’ means two incidents of violence or stalking committed by the respondent, one of which must have been within 6 months of the filing of the petition, which are directed against the petitioner or the petitioner’s immediate family member.”); see also Power v. Boyle, 60 So.3d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (explaining that an injunction for protection against repeat violence cannot be entered absent a finding of two incidents of violence or stalking, which must be supported by competent substantial evidence). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand with directions that the trial court vacate the injunction and dismiss the petition.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
MONACO, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…GRIFFIN, J. This is an Anders1 appeal in which we find no reversible error. Despite affirmance, we remand the judgment and sentence on Count 2 for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing documents. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 84 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal, but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error). Here, the trial court habitualized appellant, Moses Taylor [“Moses”], as to Count 1 (Sale of Cocaine), but did not provide for the same enhancement for…
-
Jarmal N. Brown v. State, 226 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…ida Statutes (2016),, but his judgment reflects a conviction for burglary of an occupied structure under section 810.02(3)(d). Accordingly,- we remand for correction of the judgment to reflect the defendant’s actual conviction. See Johnson v. State, 84 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. PALMER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).…
Authorities Cited
- Power v. Boyle, 60 So. 3d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)