GREGORY GERARD CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-04-24
No. 1D11-5364
WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
85 So. 3d 1190 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for attempted robbery. See Washington v. State, 37 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ducker v. State, 197 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …the written judgment reflects a conviction for count 4 as originally charged: a first degree misdemeanor. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect that count 4 is a second degree misdemeanor. See Clark v. State, 85 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding with directions to correct con [*1096] viction in judgment); see also Bryant v. State, 124 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s…
  • Dominique Hall v. State, 109 So. 3d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    …In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for home-invasion robbery pursuant to section 812.135(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). See Clark v. State, 85 So. 3d 1190, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error). AFFIRMED and REMANDED. PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967…
  • King v. State, 168 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence; however, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted after a jury trial as opposed to a plea of nolo contendré. See Clark v. State, 85 So. 3d 1190, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in judgment). Additionally, because the record reveals potential errors in the imposition of costs and fees, including a possible discrepancy betw…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw