ANDRE TAVARIS PRIM, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Alamo Fin., L.P. v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …Bank of Crestview, 513 So. 2d 179, 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) ("the maxim ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius' applies to contracts as well as statutes”). . For this reason, the plaintiff's reliance upon Duplantis v. Brock Specialty Services, Ltd., 85 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), is misplaced. . In any event, there is no evidence in the record that Alamo Rental was in fact a subsidiary or parent corporation of Alamo Financing, such that the release would have actually foreclosed the plaintiff's claim ag…
• Mathis v. Cook, 140 So. 3d 654 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …attorney’s fees and costs under the offer of judgment statute and rule, even though proposal conditioned acceptance on release of claims against defendant who was not an offeror under the proposal). But see Duplantis v. Brock Specialty Servs., Ltd., 85 So. 3d 1206, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)(where vicarious liability is contested, plaintiff is entitled to separate offers from each defendant so that plaintiff may independently and intelligently assess and evaluate each offer).3 Here, John Cook’s proposals were…

Authorities Cited

• Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
• Holmes v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)