ROBERTO FUNDORA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
Roberto Fundora appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the postconviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed.
WHATLEY, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vives v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 128 So. 3d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…o documents to suggest the recipro-cality provision of section 57.105(7) of the Florida Statutes affords attorney fees in a mortgage foreclosure action on the strength of a unilateral fee provision in a promissory note. See United States v. Wonders, 86 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Shepheard v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co., 38 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Landry v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 731 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). However, these cases are bereft of analysis and in one case, United States v. Wo…
Authorities Cited
- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (U.S. 2010)
- Edilberto Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So. 3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)