DONNA ROBERTS TRASK, APPELLANT,
v.
SCOTT A. TRASK, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2012-04-27
No. 2D11-1437
ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
86 So. 3d 592 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2012)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the final judgment must be corrected to accurately reflect the number and total amount of alimony payments as agreed upon in the mediated settlement agreement.


Facts & Procedural History

The parties entered into a mediated settlement agreement for alimony payments. The final judgment of dissolution of marriage incorporated the agreemen…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Chief Judge.

SILBERMAN, Chief Judge.

Donna Roberts Trask (the Wife) appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and the order denying her motion to set aside a mediated settlement agreement. We affirm the denial of relief on her motion to set aside the mediated settlement agreement without discussion. We remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment to properly state the number of alimony payments and total amount of alimony so as to be consistent with the mediated settlement agreement that the court approved.

The mediated settlement agreement provides that Scott A. Trask (the Husband) shall pay to the Wife thirty-nine monthly alimony payments of $500 for total, nonmodifiable alimony of $19,500. The final judgment incorporates the agreement by reference and approves the agreement but specifies that the Husband is to pay only thirty-six monthly alimony payments of $500 for total alimony of $18,000. In his answer brief, the Husband acknowledges the error in the final judgment.

Because the trial court intended to incorporate the terms of the parties’ agreement but misstated the amount of alimony payments, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected final judgment that provides for thirty-nine monthly alimony payments of $500 for a total of $19,500. We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed and remanded for corrected judgment.

ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw