TODD D. MARTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-04-11
No. 4D10-4092
MAY, C.J., POLEN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
87 So. 3d 44 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a defendant is not entitled to additional jail credit for time served in another county when the sentence in the current case is consecutive to the sentence in the other case.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought additional jail credit for time spent in prison for offenses committed in another county while on probation in this case. The circuit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion which sought additional jail credit. Appellant abandoned several claims which we do not discuss. Hammond v. State, 34 So.3d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Appellant seeks credit in this case for time he spent in prison following his convictions and sentences for various offenses in another county. Appellant committed the offenses in the other county while on probation in this case. Appellant seeks credit from the date a violation of probation warrant had issued in this case. The circuit court determined that appellant was entitled to credit only from the date the warrant was served. The circuit court correctly stated the law. Alphonso v. State, 20 So.3d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

We also affirm for an additional reason. Because the sentence following revocation of probation in this case was made consecutive to the sentence appellant was serving in the other case, he was not entitled to have his jail credit for these separate cases pyramided. Ransone v. State, 20 So.3d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA), approved, 48 So.3d 692 (Fla.2010) (applying Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986)).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and CONNER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw