MICHAEL CLARKE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
MICHAEL CLARKE, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
88 So. 3d 379
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Calhoun v. State, 259 So. 3d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
Williams v. State, 198 So. 3d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…f the [*779] motion, the circuit court nonetheless denied Williams’s request, to correct that error. A fine imposed pursuant to section 775.083 is discretionary and must be orally pronounced. Dadds, 946 So. 2d at 1130; see also Lamoreaux v. State, 88 So. 3d 379, 381 (Fla. 1st DCA. 2012) (“A discretionary fine imposed and the statutory surcharge on the fine must be stricken if the discretionary fine was not orally pronounced at sentencing.” (citing Pullam v. State, 55 So. 3d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011))).…
-
Kenyanna Racquel Cheeks v. State, 267 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)