MONTOYA P. BURNS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MONTOYA P. BURNS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
89 So. 3d 300
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Owens v. Jones, 200 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…l court’s denials of claims on the merits are being challenged, we treat the appeal as a petition invoking this Court’s certiorari jurisdiction and deny the petition on the merits without further discussion. See Thomas v. State, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 89 So. 3d 300, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reviewing the trial court’s order dismissing in part and denying in part a mandamus petition and treating as an appeal the dismissal of claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but reviewing under the certiora…
-
Molfetto v. Dep't OF Corr., 96 So. 3d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…rast to the review of a circuit court’s appellate review on the merits of administrative disciplinary action, which is reviewed by this court under the more limit [*451] ed certiorari standard. See Thomas v. State, Florida Department of Corrections, 89 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Mora v. McDonough, 956 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The standard of review of a circuit court’s order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is de novo. See Serchay v. State Farm Fla. Ins…
Authorities Cited
- Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
- Holmes v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)