ANTONIO NICOLETTA, ET UX.,
v.
B. CRUZ

Fla. | 1933-10-20
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
112 Fla. 434 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 150 So. 594
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it, is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

  • City of Bradenton v. State, 118 Fla. 838 (Fla. 1935)
    …ore approve it as correct. But the peremptory writ so awarded was such a complete departure from the terms of the commands of the alternative writ in the premises that we think the rule laid down in McNally v. State, ex rel. Bond Realization Corp., 112 Fla. 434, 150 Sou. Rep. 751, should be applied and the judgment reversed for an appropriate amendment of the alternative writ (which is the plaintiff’s declaration and the foundation for the relief he has succeeded in having awarded) and for further proceedi…
  • State v. Cullen Davis, 290 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1974)
    …der for the Twelfth Circuit did not raise any point in his brief. We deny rehearing. “In the event the State wishes to allege that we are in conflict with Proctor v. Hart, 1854, 5 Fla. 465, and McNally v. State ex rel. Bond Realization Corp., 1933, 112 Fla. 434, 150 So. 751, and seek certiorari, it may help to describe the procedural posture of the matter as we see it. We did by-pass the procedures a bit by recognizing the obvious error in this record. The State, in its petition for rehearing, makes no cha…
  • Cullen Davis v. State, 276 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
    …nder for the Twelfth Circuit did not raise any point in his brief. We deny rehearing. In the event the State wishes to allege that we are in conflict with Proctor v. Hart, 1854, 5 Fla. 465, and McNally v. State ex rel. Bond Realization Corp., 1933, 112 Fla. 434, 150 So. 751, and seek cer-tiorari, it may help to describe the procedural posture of the matter as we see it. We did by-pass the procedures a bit by recognizing the obvious error in this record. The State, in its petition for rehearing, makes no ch…

Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw