TOMAS ARIAS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court accepted jurisdiction, quashed the Third District's decision, and remanded for reconsideration.
The Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in Arias v. State, citing its prior decision in State v. Jardines. Jardines was pending review in…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stare Decisis cases and more on FLexlaw
We have for review Arias v. State, — So.3d -, 2010 WL 680701 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited as authority its decision in State v. Jardines, 9 So.3d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), quashed, 73 So.3d 34 (Fla.2011), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 995, 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012). At the time the Third District issued its Arias decision, Jardines was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).
We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Jardines v. State, 73 So.3d 34 (Fla.2011), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 995, 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012), in which we ultimately quashed the Third District’s underlying Jardines decision. We then issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not accept jurisdiction, quash the Third District’s underlying Arias decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Jardines.
Upon consideration of the response and petitioner’s reply thereto, we have determined to accept jurisdiction and grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Third District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s Jardines decision.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, J., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arias v. State, 128 So. 3d 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…re us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida, which quashed this Court’s opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of Jardines v. State, 73 So. 3d 34 (Fla.2011), ajfd, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1409, 185 L.Ed.2d 495 (2013). See Arias v. State, 90 So. 3d 269 (Fla.2012). We affirm. Detective Donnelly received an anonymous “crime stoppers” tip regarding a suspected marijuana grow house. Detective Donnelly went to the home with Sergeant Ramirez, Detective Valdez, and Detective Valdez’s drug detecting dog,…
Authorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Joelis Jardines v. State, 73 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 2011)
- State v. Joelis Jardines, 9 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)