RONALD AUSTIN MILLSAP, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONALD AUSTIN MILLSAP, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
90 So. 3d 338
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Lowry v. State, 963 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), review denied, 977 So.2d 576 (Fla.2008).
SAWAYA, MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Camilla Bernhardt and Brian Bernhardt v. Michael and Edith Halikoytakis, 95 So. 3d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…. Redland Ins. Co. v. Cem Site Constructors, Inc., 86 So. 3d 1259, 1261 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). The movant’s burden is to come forward with competent evidence to demonstrate the nonexistence of a material issue of fact. Fitzherbert v. Inland U.S. Mgmt., 90 So. 3d 338 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). It has been stated that the movant’s burden essentially amounts to “proving] a negative.” Candler Holdings Ltd. I v. Watch Omega Holdings, L.P., 947 So. 2d 1231, 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). All do…
Authorities Cited
- Lowry v. State, 963 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)