TAMARICK CRUZ, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Samori K. Walden v. State, 112 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …not file a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(b) to correct his sentence, and he did not raise the issue on appeal. Five years later, he filed this motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) to correct his sentence by deletion of the costs. In Merricks v. State, 90 So. 3d 893, 894 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), in affirming the deni [*579] al of a motion to correct an illegal sentence, we mentioned in dicta that a failure to orally pronounce the imposition of costs rendered the sentence illegal for purposes of rule 3.800(a) relief…
• Tamarick Cruz v. State, 222 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
  …rial a non-disclosed witness who undermined his [*574] defense. The witness was Kendall Murray, owner and/or bookkeeper at the car wash. She testified she had never met appellant and that he did not work there. This Court affirmed in Cruz v. State, 90 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), with a citation to Guzman v. State, 42 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). In Guzman, this Court held that a discovery violation had not been preserved for review when it occurred during the State’s direct examination of a witness a…

Authorities Cited

• Guzman v. State, 42 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)