R.B., THE MOTHER, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's findings supporting termination of parental rights were supported by competent, substantial evidence.
[1] A parent's material breach of a case plan constitutes evidence of continuing abuse, neglect, or abandonment, supporting termination of parental rights.
[2] Termination of parental rights requires a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that such termination is in the manifest best interest of the children.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe mother appealed an order terminating her parental rights to three children, arguing the termination was not in the children's best interest and no…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Manifest Best Interest Of The Children cases and more on FLexlaw
The mother appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her three older children. She argues the trial court’s findings that termination of her parental rights was in the manifest best interest of the children, as well as the least restrictive means to protect the children, are not supported by competent, substantial evidence. She also argues the trial court erred in basing the termination on her failure to comply with the case plan. We disagree with all three arguments and affirm.
Section 39.806(l)(e)2, Florida Statutes (2010), provides for the termination of parental rights when the children have been adjudicated dependent and “[t]he parent *992or parents have materially breached the case plan .... ” § 39.806(l)(e)2, Fla. Stat. (2010). Under section 39.806(l)(e)l, failure to “substantially comply with the case plan ... constitutes evidence of continuing abuse, neglect, or abandonment.” § 39.806(l)(e)l, Fla. Stat. (2010). Here, the trial court concluded that the Department of Children and Families had met the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the mother “continues to abuse, abandon and neglect her children due to her failure to substantially comply with the case plan for a period of 29 months,” and the respective fathers had abandoned the children. We have reviewed the record; the trial court’s factual findings and conclusions are supported by competent, substantial evidence. T.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 961 So.2d 1060, 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
The trial court further found that termination of the mother’s parental rights was the least restrictive means of protecting the children, and having weighed the relevant options, was in the children’s best interest. We also find these conclusions supported by the record and the trial court’s factual findings. We have previously affirmed the termination of her parental rights to her youngest child. R.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 80 So.3d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). We now affirm this termination order.
Affirmed.
MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- T.C. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 961 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- R.B. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 80 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)