WAYNE MOORE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bank OF NEW York for the Noteholders Cwabs Inc. v. Calloway, 157 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …is reviewed de novo. See Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Huber, 137 So. 3d 562, 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) Section 90.803(6), Florida Statutes (2008), “provides a hearsay exception for records of regularly conducted business activity.” A.S. v. State, 91 So. 3d 270, 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). To admit business record evidence under this subsection, the proponent must demonstrate: (1) that the record was made at or near the time of the event; (2) that it was made by or from information transmitted by a person wit…
• SAS v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 112 So. 3d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …witness had no personal knowledge of [*780] the amount at issue and the testimony was based on information received from employees of the victim’s financial institution and from financial statements received from those institutions); A.S. v. State, 91 So. 3d 270, 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Because the actual estimate was not admitted into evidence, the testimony concerning its contents should have been stricken. Without this evidence, the record does not provide competent, substantial evidence demonstrating…
• B.J.M. v. State, 185 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
  …, substantial evidence ■demonstrating the essential element of value. The lower court’s decision should be remanded to reverse or reduce Appellant’s [juvenile] adjudication of first degree misdemeanor criminal mischief. We agree. In A.S. v. State, 91 So. 3d 270, 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), the victim testified to the value of'the damage caused by the defendant, basing his opinion on an estimate prepared by one of his employees. The estimate was not admitted into evidence. Id. The Fourth District explained tha…

Authorities Cited

• Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
• Holmes v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)