KENNETH HARTLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. | 2012-05-31
No. SC11-1884
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABÁRGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
91 So. 3d 848 Florida Supreme Court (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011).

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABÁRGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hartley v. State, 175 So. 3d 757 (Fla. 2015)
    …at 1011, 1016. The trial court also denied Hartley’s first successive postconviction motion, asserting a claim under Porter v. McCollum, 558 U.S. 30, 130 S.Ct. 447, 175 L.Ed.2d 398 (2009), and we affirmed the denial. Hartley v. State (Hartley III), 91 So. 3d 848 (Fla.), cert. denied, -— U.S. :-, 133 S.Ct. 758, 184 L.Ed.2d 501 (2012). The instant motion is Hartley’s second successive postconviction motion and asserts that Hartley must be resen-tenced to life based on the newly discovered evidence that his co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw