RICARDO LANE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-07-11
No. 4D11-3125
WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
92 So. 3d 885 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sherwood v. State, 745 So.2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gonzalez v. State, 132 So. 3d 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …of criminal mischief was illegal, as the statutory maximum was six months. See Smith v. State, 484 So. 2d 581 (Fla.1986). The State contended that Defendant was not entitled to correction of a sentence that had been fully served. See Lane v. State, 92 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Based on the State’s reasoning, the trial court denied Defendant’s motion. Thereafter, Defendant filed a motion to vacate the court’s ruling, arguing that he was not precluded from seeking relief on a fully-served sentence where…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw