SHIMEEK GRIDINE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-05-29
No. 1D10-2517
WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
93 So. 3d 360 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*361On Motion for Kehearing and Certification

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and certification, we deny the motion for rehearing but grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.

We hereby certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN Graham, v. Florida, — U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PROHIBIT SENTENCING A FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD TO A PRISON SENTENCE OF SEVENTY YEARS FOR THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE MURDER?

WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shimeeka Daquiel Gridine v. State, 175 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 2015)
    …PERRY, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Gridine v. State, 93 So. 3d 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). In its decision, the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance: DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN GRAHAM V. FLORIDA 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PRO…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw