MANDY M. CARUSO, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL CARUSO, APPELLEE
MANDY M. CARUSO, APPELLANT,
PAUL CARUSO, APPELLEE
93 So. 3d 532
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The Court has determined that the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage is not a final order because it contemplates the exercise of further judicial labor on the non-collateral issue of child support. See Cassell v. Erquiaga, 28 So.3d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as premature.
WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.G. and C.G. v. R.C. (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)…consider “the child’s age and the child’s need for a permanent and stable home.” Moreover, T.H., J.T., and R.R. involved different facts and proceeded under chapter 39. The trial court acknowledged the Fifth District’s observation in M.S.B. v. R.B., 93 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (Mem.), that “[s]ection 63.089(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that where a parent is or will be incarcerated for a significant period of a child’s minority, the child is deemed to have been abandoned.” Id. at 532 n.1. (…
Authorities Cited
- Cassell v. Eugenio Erquiaga, 28 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)