SADE MARIE DUNBAR, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Percival Charles Ferris, Jr. v. State, 100 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …Florida Statutes. See Johnson, 44 So. 3d at 200 (noting that a claim need not be repetitive to be frivolous and stating that a court may sanction a prisoner under section 944.279 regardless of the prisoner’s history of filing); accord Hall v. State, 94 So. 3d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). The postconviction process and the appellate courts do not exist simply to give prisoners something to do while they serve their sentences, and there comes a point in every criminal case that the defendant needs to accept the f…
• Bradford B. Banks, Jr. v. State, 211 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
  …ely rule 3.850 motion, which he did not do. Lastly, we substantively and procedurally reject Banks’s plea for relief based on an alleged “manifest injustice” exception. See State v. Manning, 121 So. 3d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Hall v. State, 94 So. 3d 655, 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“‘Simply construing an alleged error as “manifest injustice” does not relieve [an appellant] of the time bar contained in’ rule 3.850.” (quoting Johnson v. State, 44 So. 3d 198, 200-01 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010))). AFFIRMED. PAL…
• State v. Manning, 121 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …d under 3.850); Sampedro v. State, 10 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (time limitations of 3.850 apply to claims that trial court failed to give proper instructions regarding possibility of deportation). Manning’s case is no different. Hall v. State, 94 So. 3d 655, 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“[S]imply construing an alleged error as ‘manifest injustice’ does not relieve [an appellant] of the time bar contained in rule 3.850.”) (internal quotations omitted). Simply put, Manning could not circumvent the time limi…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Adkins, 96 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2012)