THOMAS E. SHARP, APPELLANT,
v.
LUIS E. BARRETO, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2012-07-18
No. 3D11-1382
Before SHEPHERD and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
95 So. 3d 321 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2012)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw