DR. MITCHELL SENFT, APPELLANT,
v.
PATTERSON DENTAL SUPPLY, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-08-01
No. 4D11-712
WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
95 So. 3d 398 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment entered in this contract action, as the ap-pellee failed to conclusively negate the affirmative defenses raised by appellant. See Corya v. Sanders, 76 So.3d 31, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Riverwood Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Litecrete, Inc., 69 So.3d 983, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Moreover, the appel-lee relied in its affidavit in support of summary judgment on a contract (order form) which was never mentioned or relied upon as part of the contract in its complaint. At the very least, it raises a material issue of fact as to what constituted the contract between the parties. See, e.g., Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 391 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw