ROBERT E. NETTLES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• E.G. v. State, 263 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
  …pellant to a non-secure residential program to be followed by probation. This appeal followed. “It is well established that courts must strictly comply with the statutory procedures surrounding a juvenile disposition hearing.” K.P. v. State, 97 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting K.D. v. State, 911 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)). 3 Section 985.43(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that a predisposition report is required when a trial court anticipates residential commit…
• J.R. v. State, 268 So. 3d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
  …le disposition hearings is required. See K.D. v. State, 911 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The court errs when it proceeds with a disposition involving residential commitment without obtaining the comprehensive evaluation. K.P. v. State, 97 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). 4 The State contends that appellant absconded and made himself unavailable to complete the required evaluation. It analogizes the situation to one of invited error. However, the statute mandates a comprehensi…
• L.S. v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
  …lty he or she should be required to pay for such transgression. § 985.433(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2021). “It is well established that courts must strictly comply with the statutory procedures surrounding a juvenile disposition hearing.” K.P. v. State, 97 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “Failure to strictly comply with mandatory statutory provisions for disposition hearings results in reversible error.” K.D. v. State, 911 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). In the case before us, the trial court never…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Adkins, 96 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2012)
• Maestas v. State, 76 So. 3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)