HENRY BERNARD VANN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plain Language Interpretation cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for removal of the sexual offender registration requirement. In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was “not more than 4 years older than the victim” pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Consistent with the prior decisions of our sister courts construing the plain language of the statute, we conclude the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion because appellant was four years, three months, and ten days older than the victim. See State v. Welch, 94 So.3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); State v. Samuels, 76 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Marcel, 67 So.3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.
PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Rudolfo Caragol, 120 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…mines the person meets the criteria in subsection (1) and removal of the registration requirement will not conflict with federal law, it may grant the petition and order the removal of the registration requirement.” (emphasis added)); Vann v. State, 99 So. 3d 633, 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was ‘not more than 4 years older than the victim’ pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes.”); State v. Samuels, 7…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Welch, 94 So. 3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
- State v. Marcel, 67 So. 3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
- State v. Samuels, 76 So. 3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)