D'ANDRE ROLACK, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant Appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw the opinion issued October 3, 2012, and substitute the following opinion in its stead.
D’Andre Rolack filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s June 11, 2012, ruling that his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for postconviction relief be stricken as successive. Because the trial court never issued a written order, we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus, and remand for the trial court to enter an order on Rolack’s motion.
On appeal from the denial of a motion for postconviction relief, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D). Should the trial court summarily deny these claims as successive, the trial court should attach to its order record proof of the successive nature of the motion.
Petition granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…rd.” Id. (quoting Foster v. State, 810 So. 2d 910, 914 (Fla. 2002)). This Court must reverse an appeal from a summary denial of postconviction relief unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. Rolack v. State, 100 So. 3d 766, 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D). Because the trial court summarily denied Lee’s motion without any elaboration and the record fails to conclusively refute his claims, we reverse the denial of postconviction relief. F…