DAVID LOTRIDGE, APPELLANT,
v.
WANDA S. LOBASSO, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-11-21
No. 4D11-4391
GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.
101 So. 3d 402 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In August, 2003, the circuit court entered an agreed final injunction for protection against repeat violence against appellant. In May, 2011, appellant moved to vacate, modify, or dissolve the injunction; he alleged changed circumstances and contended that the injunction had served its purpose. The circuit court summarily denied the motion without a hearing. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant’s motion, where he shall have “a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Keegan LEE v. Kierstin Matsuda (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …t court summarily denied the motion without a hearing and without providing reasons for denying the motion. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant's motion, to provide him with a meaningful opportunity to be heard. See Lotridge v. Lobasso, 101 So. 3d 402, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (reversing and remanding for a hearing on appellant’s motion, where he shall have “a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”); Barfield v. Kay, 140 So. 3d 703 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (summary denial of a motion to vacate or modify…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw