REALIE N. GULLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A dissenting opinion argues that a substitute teacher should receive unemployment benefits because the school board failed to provide evidence that he was ineligible under the summer vacation rule.
The dissenting justice would reverse the denial of unemployment benefits and remand the case for payment, as the school board failed to meet its burden of proof.
Mr. Vidal appealed his ineligibility for unemployment benefits, asserting he had no contract or assurance of future employment for the next school ter…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISMISSED. The Court has determined that the notice of appeal failed to timely invoke its jurisdiction. Accordingly, appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, filed on November 2, 2012, is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., Concur.