MELVIN THOMPSON, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-12-10
No. 1D11-5794
WOLF, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.
102 So. 3d 714 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Ross v. State, 88 So.3d 297 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). We also affirm the issues raised by the State on cross-appeal.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cintron v. U.S. Attorney General, 882 F.3d 1380 (11th Cir. 2018)
    …on, manufacture, delivery and bringing into this state."); Ramos v. State , 529 So. 2d 807, 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988) ("[T]rafficking includes the acts of possession and delivery[.]"). Only one case the government cites, Burson v. State , 102 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012), concerns the statute under which Cintron was convicted. Contrary to the government's argument, though, Burson does not support its position; indeed, Burson is fully consistent with our conclusion that Florida Statutes…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw