CARLOS Z. ROJAS, PETITIONER,
v.
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, ETC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a petitioner is entitled to receive pretrial discovery materials prepared at public expense from their former counsel.
Carlos Rojas, a former inmate, petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel his former counsel, the Public Defender's Office, to provide him with all p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
Carlos Z. Rojas filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel his former counsel, the Office of the Public Defender, to provide him with “[a]ll pre-trial discovery materials including photos, ... [mjedical [r]eport[s], [e]valuation[s], etc. on Defendant [and] copies of recorded, written, or typed statements made by Defendant, i.e., confessions.”
In response to the petition, Assistant Public Defender John H. Tedder indicated that he could offer no reason why Rojas’ petition for writ of mandamus should not be granted.
Under the controlling law, Rojas is entitled to the originals, or copies thereof, of depositions and transcripts and any other materials in his former attorney’s possession that were prepared at public expense. See LaFlower v. State, 929 So.2d 58, 58 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (citing Potts v. State, 869 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Ramos v. State, 757 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Colon v. Irwin, 732 So.2d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)); see also Smith v. State, 889 So.2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (“The petitioner is entitled to receive from his former counsel, at no cost to petitioner, any and all trial and hearing transcripts, copies of motions, and any state discovery presented to defense counsel.”). Accordingly, we grant the petition and direct the Office of the Public Defender to provide Rojas with all pretrial discovery materials related to lower court case number 10-*775CF-00122B-A-Y (including photos,1 and any recorded, written, or typed statements made by Rojas, i.e., confessions) that are in its possession.
PETITION GRANTED.
ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Potts v. State, 869 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- Colon v. Irwin, 732 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Efrain Ramos v. State, 757 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Mills v. State, 889 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- LaFLOWER v. State, 929 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Morse v. State, 50 So. 3d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)