NORMAN SCOTT AND JACQUELINE SCOTT, APPELLANTS,
v.
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE
NORMAN SCOTT AND JACQUELINE SCOTT, APPELLANTS,
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE
103 So. 3d 225
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Summarily affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315.
POLEN, STEVENSON and CONNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Kremer, 114 So. 3d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…the sentence is not within the limits prescribed by law and is properly viewed as an ‘illegal’ sentence.’” (quoting State v. R.F., 648 So. 2d 293, 294 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995))). The First District thereafter affirmed its ruling in State v. Schroff, 103 So. 3d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Our court has similarly held that mandatory minimum sentencing enhancements are nondiscretionary and, therefore, trial courts lack the authority to refuse to apply them. State v. Moore, 854 So. 2d 832, 833-34 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003…