KIMBERLY ANN MILES AND JODY HAYNES, APPELLANTS,
v.
DANIEL WEINGRAD, M.D., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2012-12-19
No. 3D12-779
Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
103 So. 3d 259 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2012) Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Chief Judge.

WELLS, Chief Judge.

Finding no conflict between our prior opinion in Weingrad v. Miles, 29 So.3d 406 *260(Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and the Supreme Court’s opinion in American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So.3d 120 (Fla.2011), we affirm.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miles v. Daniel Weingrad, M.D., 164 So. 3d 1208 (Fla. 2015)
    …ing no conflict between our prior opinion in Weingrad v. Miles [ {Miles I) ], 29 So. 3d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and the Supreme Court’s opinion in American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla.2011), we affirm.” Miles v. Weingrad {Miles II), 103 So. 3d 259, 259-60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). The majority has granted review on the ground that this decision expressly and directly conflicts with Raphael v. Sheeter, 18 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). I disagree. Under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida C…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw