TAMPA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
MERCEDES RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
TAMPA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
MERCEDES RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
104 So. 2d 792
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1958)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and same having been duly considered, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
KANNER, C. J., ALLEN, J., and SMITH, D. C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rosin v. Peninsular Life Ins. Co., 116 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)…ALLEN, Chief Judge. This action at law was instituted by the appellants, as plaintiffs in the lower court, in 1953 and is a companion case to Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. Rosin, Fla.App.1958, 104 So. 2d 792, and involves substantially the same parties and factual situation. The above reported case was filed on the same day as the instant suit and was filed by Elsie P. Rosin in her individual capacity as the named beneficiary in the application for insu…
-
Carmel Carter v. Supplies, Inc., 411 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…orporate place of business. The terms “infrequent and occasional” are unambiguous and therefore must be given their natural meaning. Ranger Insurance Company v. Harrell, 286 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. Rosin, 104 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). “Occasionally” is defined by Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary (1977 Edition) as “met with, appearing, or occurring at irregular or infrequent intervals.” “Infrequent” is defined as “(1) seldom happening or occurring: RARE, (2)…
-
Medley Warehouses, LC v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 39 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…ry Constr., Inc. v. Barry Gibson & Assocs., 523 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (same). Accordingly, where the terms of a binder are ambiguous, it is to be construed against the insurer and in favor of the insured. Peninsular Life Ins. Co. v. Rosin, 104 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Cf. Hulse v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Fla., 424 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (where insurance policy is capable of two constructions, court should adopt construction favorable to insured). Here, the condition in the binder st…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence