TAMPA ELECTRIC CO.
v.
J. D. DAVIS

Fla. | 1933-10-31
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
112 Fla. 524 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 150 So. 728
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted from the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given, in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judg*525ment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of - the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Est. of Charles R. Switzer v. Street, 115 Fla. 780 (Fla. 1934)
  • Crosthwait v. The N. Tr. Co., 144 Fla. 231 (Fla. 1940)
    …review, in one phase or another. Some of this [*234] litigation has reached the Court on appeal. See In re: Estate of Charles R. Switzer, deceased, Charles G. Darling, appellants, v. Jeanne W. Street, as Administratrix, etc., Appellee, 112 Fla. 525, 150 So. 728; also same case, 115 Fla. 780, 156 So. 1; Jeanne W. Street as Administratrix, etc., v. Florence W. Crosthwait, et al., 134 Fla. 158, 183 So. 820; same case on rehearing, 136 Fla. 327, 186 So. 516. Counsel for appellants state the questions involved…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw