MICHAEL ALLEN GRIFFIN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Tavares David Calloway v. State, 210 So. 3d 1160 (Fla. 2017)
  …-way and Odom. The court also noted that Calloway was free to recall Odom during his case, which did not occur. Calloway now asserts that these limitations were improper. Self-serving hearsay statements are generally inadmissible. Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1000 (Fla. 2012) (citing § 90.803(18), Fla. Stat. (2007)). However, if a partial statement, writing, or recording is admitted, the rule of completeness permits the opposing party to introduce other portions of that same statement, writing, or recor…
• Kaczmar v. State, 228 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2017)
  …w penalty phase proceeding. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we affirm Kaez-mar’s sentence of death. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS We previously set forth the relevant facts in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 995-98 (Fla. 2012). Kaczmar was convicted for first-degree murder, attempted sexual battery, and arson. During Kaezmar’s first penalty phase, the parties stipulated that Kaczmar had been previously convicted of a robbery. Id. at 997. The State pres…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Wood v. State, 209 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 2017)
  …pported by competent, substantial evidence. This alone would require a finding that the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: We note that our conclusion in this regard is also consistent with our pre-Hurst precedent in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So. 3d 990, 1008 (Fla. 2012), where we held that, upon striking the COP and felony-murder aggravating factors so that only one valid aggravating factor remained, such error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Post-Hurst, this conclusion is even more co…

Authorities Cited

• Walton v. State, 77 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 2011)