OTIS HEARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
OTIS HEARD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
105 So. 3d 614
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).
WARNER, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shamail Waheed v. Brummer, 162 So. 3d 163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”); Pineiro v. Am. Express Card Servs. Co., 105 So. 3d 614, 615-16 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Wah-eed’s objections to specific itemizations on the time records and request that the Brummers’ attorney explain Maddox’s qualifications were insufficient to preserve' an objection as to judicial notice. While we are u…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Adkins, 96 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2012)
- Maestas v. State, 76 So. 3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)