MICHAEL M. HUDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-01-16
No. 3D12-2357
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
105 So. 3d 621 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d

*6221236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))); see also Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla.2012).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw