STEVEN W. HAUN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Brinson v. State, 215 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
  …urrently active case in which [Brin-son] is representing himself and to any ‘future case.’ ” A circuit court’s order prohibiting pro se filings by a defendant is reviewed by the appellate court under the abuse of discretion standard. Ashe v. State, 106 So. 3d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citing Hudson v. State, 95 So. 3d 413, 414 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)). Initially, we find no abuse of discretion in the court barring Brinson from future pro se filings attacking his judgment, convictions, or sentence in Case No.…
• Wallace v. State, 127 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …PER CURIAM. We affirm, based upon State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999), the trial court’s order barring the appellant from further pro se filings. An order prohibiting pro se filings is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Ashe v. State, 106 So. 3d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Hudson v. State, 95 So. 3d 413, 414 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Generally, “a trial court’s decision does not constitute an abuse of discretion unless no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.” McCray v.…
• Edwards v. State, 192 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  …cer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999). As set forth below, we affirm and also address Appellant’s numerous frivolous appeals. We review a circuit court’s order prohibiting additional pro se filings by a prisoner “for an abuse of discretion.” Ashe v. State, 106 So. 3d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). As stated in Golden v. Buss, 60 So. 3d 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011): It is well-settled that courts have the inherent authority and duty to limit abuses of the judicial process by pro se litigants. See In re McDonald, 489 U.S.…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Nassau P'rs, Ltd., 878 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)