MARGARITA CARRASQUERO, APPELLANT,
v.
MAPFRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, ETC., APPELLEE
MARGARITA CARRASQUERO, APPELLANT,
MAPFRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, ETC., APPELLEE
106 So. 3d 989
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Opinion of the Court
The holding in Carrasquero v. Ethan’s Auto Express, Inc., 949 So.2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), that Ethan’s was not the owner of the vehicle involved in the instant accident compels, as the trial court correctly held in dismissing the complaint, the concomitant conclusion that it and its driver, the actual owner, were not covered under Ethan’s liability policy with the ap-pellee insurer here. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hartzog, 917 So.2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Se. Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Rice, 515 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Se. Fid. Ins. Co. v. Rice, 515 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hartzog, 917 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
- Carrasquero v. Ethan's Auto Express, Inc., 949 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)