SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
EDSEL CADENA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-02-20
No. 3D12-1246
Before SUAREZ, CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.
106 So. 3d 1009 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw