D. H. TART
v.
GULF POWER CO.

Fla. | 1933-10-31
Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur., Davis, C. J., dissents.
112 Fla. 543 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 150 So. 727
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Johnson, 112 Fla. 112 (Fla. 1933)
    …n law [*115] upon the assets in the representative’s hands which are subject to being impressed with the costs and expenses of the estate’s administration. See State ex rel. Jackson v, Lee, Comptroller, decided November 9, 1933, at the present term, 150 So. 727. A judgment recovered in any such action at law against the Comptroller or his liquidator, or against both, would not be a pers'onal judgment against the defendant Comptroller or liquidator, nor a judgment against the State of Florida. Such a judgm…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw