STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
CEDRIC DEWAYNE LEE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court held that the trial court's reasons for mitigating the sentence lacked record support.
The defendant pleaded guilty to felony driving while license suspended. The trial judge mitigated the sentence, suspending incarceration upon probatio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mitigation Of Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
The vehicle of Appellee, Cedric Dewayne Lee, was stopped for illegal tint. It turned out that his license had been revoked for 60 months as a habitual traffic violator. Lee entered an open plea to felony driving while license suspended with a guideline minimum sentence of 19.5 months in the Department of Corrections.
The trial judge mitigated the sentence and imposed a sentence of 19.5 months incarceration but suspended it upon Lee’s completion of 24 months’ probation. The court’s departure reasons were that Lee was cooperative and remorseful. The State appeals the sentence claiming it lacks record support.
If Lee cooperated at all, it was after his traffic stop. See State v. Subido, 925 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); State v. Bell, 854 So.2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Lee did admit, after a request to provide his driver’s license, that his license was suspended and “possibly habitual.” His scoresheet revealed, in addition to one first-degree felony, two second-degree felonies, five third-degree felonies, and several misdemeanors, including four for driving while license suspended. Lee’s cooperation was minimal at best and he failed to establish this basis for departure.
There was no finding by the trial judge that the offense was unsophisticated or, after four previous arrests for substantially the same offense, that it was an isolated *1218incident. Further, there was no evidence in the sentencing record to justify a finding of remorse.
REVERSED and REMANDED for RESENTENCING.
SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Dreama Adea Bell, 854 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Edwards v. State, 925 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- State v. Subido, 925 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)