TYRONE DONALDSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-02-21
No. 1D13-0454
ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
110 So. 3d 17 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Salter, 143 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …tions, unless the defendant was either provided with counsel or validly waived that right.”). Because it was within the circuit court’s discretion to divest itself of jurisdiction over the surviving misdemeanor DUI, we affirm. See Woodbury v. State, 110 So. 3d 17, 18-19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (explaining that once the felony DUI charge was dismissed and the information refiled in county court, the [*1050] circuit and county courts had concurrent jurisdiction over the misdemeanor DUI). Affirmed. ALTENBERND, W…
  • State v. Borko, 173 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
    …s or whether the misdemeanor information can be deemed timely because it relates back to the felony information that was filed within the felony time period. Initially, we note that the State’s reliance on this court’s opinion in Woodbury v. State, 110 So. 3d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), is misplaced as that case is factually and procedurally distinguishable from the instant case. In Woodbury, felony DUI charges were dismissed on the defendant’s motion based on the fact that the defendant did not have the requisi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw