SMITH MICHEL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …. 4th DCA 2012) (concluding that “the record contains only disposition orders, so we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated”); M.A.L. v. State, 110 So. 3d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). See also Burst v. State, 836 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The State contends this appeal is moot because the trial court did in fact enter a written order following T.M.…
• Harrington v. State, 238 So. 3d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  …th credit for time served). It did so without holding a separate sentencing hearing. We review a trial court’s decision to revoke probation for an abuse of discretion. Grace v. State, 198 So. 3d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); M.A.L. v. State, 110 So. 3d 493, 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). “If reasonable men could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, then the action is not unreasonable and there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion.” Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d…
• N.j.p v. State, 308 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
  …ditions of probation that were violated.” Hardison v. State, 271 So. 3d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (quoting King v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)). This applies to juveniles the same as adult defendants. See M.A.L. v. State, 110 So. 3d 493, 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Here, the trial court’s disposition orders do not comply with rule 8.115(d)(2) because they only included language stating that N.J.P. would be committed for an indeterminate period no longer than his twenty-first birthday…

Authorities Cited

• Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. 342 (U.S. 2013)