AARON FRANKLIN BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
NORTH FLORIDA SURGEONS, P.A. AND G. STEVEN WEBB, M.D. ET AL., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-03-22
No. 1D12-3383
VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
110 So. 3d 962 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013) Negative Treatment
Cited by 20 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Franks v. Bowers, 62 So.3d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (13 total)

  • Booker v. State, 244 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  • Reed v. State, 192 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …judicial circuit in which the offender, is sentenced”). Our sister courts of appeal have noted that the purpose of section 775.082(10) is “to keejp certain offenders out of the state prison system.” Jones, 71 So. 3d at 175; see also Porter v. State, 110 So. 3d 962, 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), dismissed as moot, 137 So. 3d 1021 (Fla.2014) (“[D]ue to an ever-increasing prison population, the cost of prison building and operation, and the downturn in the economy, the Florida Legislature enacted section 775.082(10).…
  • Brown v. State, 260 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2018)
    …providing for "mandatory mitigation " of the maximum penalty of up to 5 years' imprisonment that, but for subsection (10), would apply to Brown's third-degree felony conviction pursuant to subsection (3)(e). Id. at 1263-64 (citing Porter v. State , 110 So. 3d 962, 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ); see also id. at 1265-66 ("[S]ection 775.082(10) is a mitigation statute, and not one that unconstitutionally allows an increase in the statutory maximum based upon judicial fact-finding."). Because Brown has since served…

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw