ROY M. JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-02-05
No. 1D11-6179
PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.
111 So. 3d 190 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the lower court erred in denying post-conviction relief on certain grounds and abused its discretion on another, while affirming denial on other grounds.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, raising eight grounds. The lower court denied relief on all grounds. The state conceded erro…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The lower court denied appellant’s timely motion* for post-conviction relief raising eight grounds, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm Issue I without comment, denying grounds 2, 5, 7, and 8. We reverse and remand Issues II and III for further proceedings. The state has conceded error.

As to Issue II, the lower court erred as a matter of law by concluding that the portions of the record attached to the final *191order conclusively established that defendant was not entitled to relief on ground 4 below. See Pennington v. State, 84 So.3d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Williams v. State, 924 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Tidwell v. State, 844 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

As to Issue III, the lower court abused its discretion by failing to address defendant’s amended 3.850 motion, which defendant had filed within the two-year time limit. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 759 (Fla.2007); Sinclair v. State, 959 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Appellant did not appeal the lower court’s denial of grounds 1, 3, and 6.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw