GALILEAN FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER, APPELLANT,
v.
CENTRAL FLORIDA DISTRICT CHURCH, ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2013-04-26
No. 5D12-235
TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
111 So. 3d 304 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2013)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court reviewed a dismissal of claims brought by a church against its parent denomination. While most claims were properly dismissed, the court reversed the dismissal of a conversion claim concerning personal property left behind by the church.


Holding

The trial court did not err in dismissing the claims for wrongful eviction, wrongful foreclosure, and unjust enrichment. However, the dismissal of the conversion claim was an error, as the Nazarene Church provided no legal basis for retaining the Worship Center's personal property.


Headnotes

[1] A church's declaration of another member church as a "church in crisis" and its subsequent "disorganization" may lead to a dispute over property possession.

[2] A claim for wrongful eviction may arise when a religious organization is locked out of premises it occupies.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“We find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of those claims, save for the conversion claim.”

This quote establishes the court's decision to uphold most of the lower court's dismissals while identifying the exception.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Nazarene Church declared the Galilean Family Worship Center a "church in crisis" and "disorganized" it, demanding it vacate church-owned property.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.

*305GRIFFIN, J.

Galilean Family Worship Center [“Worship Center”] appeals a final order dismissing its amended complaint against Central Florida District Church of the Nazarene Church [“Nazarene Church”]. The dispute centers on the decision by Nazarene Church to declare the Worship Center a “church in crisis” and to “disorganize” it as a member of the Church of the Nazarene. At the time this action was taken, Worship Center occupied premises owned by Nazarene Church. Nazarene Church demanded that Worship Center vacate Nazarene Church property as of the effective date of their “disorganization.” Worship Center attributed the strain to arbitrary pastoral assignments by Nazarene Church and to what it viewed as a “cultural divide” with Nazarene Church leaders. Because Worship Center was of the view that “proper channels” had not been followed to disorganize it, Worship Center failed to return possession of the property to Nazarene Church. Nazarene Church responded by locking Worship Center out of the property.

Worship Center filed suit against Nazarene Church, seeking damages for “wrongful eviction,” “wrongful foreclosure,” unjust enrichment and conversion. We find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of those claims, save for the conversion claim. According to Worship Center’s pleading, at the time Nazarene Church took back control of the property formerly occupied by Worship Center, there was personal property owned by Worship Center that Nazarene Church has refused to turn over to Worship Center. Worship Center’s occupation of the premises was governed by agreements between the two entities, but Nazarene Church has offered no legal basis for any claim to this personal property and no excuse for its retention of this property. Nor can we find in the record any basis to apply the church autonomy doctrine to this claim. Accordingly, as to the conversion claim only, we reverse the order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED in part; and REVERSED in part.

TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw