JOHN A. OLIVER, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY ANNE OLIVER, APPELLEE
JOHN A. OLIVER, APPELLANT,
MARY ANNE OLIVER, APPELLEE
112 So. 3d 538
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2013)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
John A. Oliver, the former husband, appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Mary Anne Oliver, the former wife. We affirm the final judgment, but modify one provision. The final judgment required the former husband to reimburse the former wife seventy-five percent of the cost of any medical expenses incurred by the minor or dependent children. We modify this provision to apply only to non-elective reasonable and necessary medical expenses. The former husband is not responsible for elective medical procedures, absent his express agreement or court order. See Hill v. Hill, 706 So.2d 406, 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.
ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Mosley, 149 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 2014)…se we consider whether consecutive sentences may be imposed for prison releasee reoffender (PRR) offenses that were committed during a single criminal episode. We have for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Mosley v. State, 112 So. 3d 538, 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), which held that “PRR sentences may not be ordered to run consecutively when the crimes were committed during a single criminal episode.” The First District’s decision expressly and directly conflicts with Young v. State, 37…
-
Claycomb v. State, 142 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…es. Id. at 391. Notwithstanding Reeves and Young, the First District has continued to adhere to the rule that “PRR sentences may not be ordered to run consecutively when the crimes were committed during a single criminal episode.” Mosley v. State, 112 So. 3d 538, 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The Florida Supreme Court has granted review of the Mosley decision. See State v. Mosley, No. SC13-704, 2014 WL 305705 (Fla. Jan. 14, 2014). Recently, the Florida Supreme Court held that a trial court may impose a habitual…
-
Frank A.L. Mosley v. State, 141 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…the case was remanded to the trial court for resentencing. In reversing the original sentence, we explained that PRR sentences may not be ordered to run consecutively when the crimes were committed during a single criminal episode. Mosley v. State, 112 So. 3d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), rev. granted, No. SC13-704, 2014 WL 305705 (Fla. Jan. 14, 2014). On remand, the trial court sentenced Mosley to consecutive sentences, but removed the PRR designation from Count II. Mosley appeals his new sentences, arguing th…
Authorities Cited
- Ripley v. State, 706 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Hill v. Hill, 706 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)